Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padmalal Sandungahawatte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  20:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Padmalal Sandungahawatte

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails WP:ANYBIO. The subject was only a deputy inspector general of police, the third most senior rank in the Sri Lanka Police Service, which does warrant auto-notability. Dan arndt (talk) 07:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) is Senior gazetted officer of Sri Lanka Police, should not be deleted instead allow the article to be further improved.DilJco (talk) 07:55, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment just because they are/were a senior police officer does not make them automatically notable. Clearly fails to satisfy the requirements under WP:ANYBIO. Dan arndt (talk) 09:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  08:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The coverage is WP:ROUTINE coverage of promotions and assignments. No indication that there is significant, independent coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Can't find any in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.