Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padonki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Padonkaffsky jargon. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 19:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Padonki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no sourced material in this article which does not appear in Padonkaffsky jargon. For a very simple reason, that the only manifestation of this "subculture" is the jargon. Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  19:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect. I agree that there is no verifiable content beyond jargon. (Even some footnoted is dubious as well). However the term itself is known.   - Altenmann >t 05:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If it is determined that there's no independent notability, then redirect. Because the term looks like a much better search term than "Padonkaffsky jargon". --Moscow Connection (talk) 12:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I would not object moving Padonkaffsky jargon to Padonki.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks like a good idea, but I'm not 100% sure. I've searched Google Books, and the term "Padonkaffsky jargon" has been used 1 time too. (There are several hits, but all except one are print versions of Wikipedia articles.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.