Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paedoracism

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 03:36, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Paedoracism
Delete appears to be a neologism, although I can imagine the concept may exist. I get no Googles for either spelling, so it is at best unverifiable, and might be original research. -Splash 00:06, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I got an edit conflict trying to put the vfd header on this article.  I get zero Google hits for either spelling and only one Yahoo! search hit for Paedoracism.  (and the site it comes up on is a pretty disgusting blog) Zoe 00:07, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism for sure. Like Zoe, I do not recommend clicking on that Yahoo! result. Fernando Rizo T/C 00:19, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is the site (Take my word for it, nothing worth reading).  Only thing I found on the net relating to it though, which makes it a neologism with a website.   &rarr;ub&#949;r n&#949;mo &rarr;  lóquï 00:35, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * KeepGoogle hits, Others:   unsigned comment by 62.255.64.6. -Splash 00:43, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * To clarify, the Google hits counts are, respectively: 1, 0, 4 (and of the 4 at least two are "pedo, racist"). -Splash 00:43, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * paedophile racist results from google  unsigned comment by 62.255.64.6.  &rarr;ub&#949;r n&#949;mo &rarr;  lóquï 01:11, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * This just shows the word being mentioned in passing in two obscure websites. It needs much more than this for notability to be proved.   &rarr;ub&#949;r n&#949;mo &rarr;  lóquï 01:11, August 16, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per Splash. --Tysto 05:07, 2005 August 16 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. the wub  "?/!"  07:48, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn neo. RasputinAXP   talk  *  contribs  13:19, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. Dottore So 17:56, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism. CDThieme 20:09, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As obscurantism and original research--Knucmo2 21:35, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. -Willmcw 19:49, August 17, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.