Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paeiz Azmi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was D e lete. Tiptoety talk 23:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Paeiz Azmi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Insufficient claims to notability Aparhizi (talk) 22:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO, no independent sources. Huon (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as an autobio that fails WP:BIO in general and WP:PROF in specific B figura  (talk) 23:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. See Google Scholar at http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Paeiz+Azmi&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search Is there an article on him in the Farsi-language Wikipedia? What do you get when you do a Google search for the Farsi spelling of his name?
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 23:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 23:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No article in fa.wiki, and google search for both پاییز عزمی and پائیز عزمی : one hits: 1, 2.Aparhizi (talk) 13:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Not having an article in Persian Wikipedia is not important. Also for the notability of people in academia (specially science and engineering), search results from "Google Scholar" (for the English spelling of the name) are much more relevant tan searching the original name (in this case Persian). Alefbe (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. An associate professor whose PhD dates from 2002 would have to have done something special to meet WP:PROF, and I see no evidence of this. Google Scholar produces a top citation of 23, with his other papers only having a handful of citations . I take the point about the English language, but the departmental website is in English and his selected papers all have English titles. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet Notability (academics). Alefbe (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I'm sensitive to the argument that we should try to be more inclusive of academics from beyond the first world, but there's no evidence that he passes WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.