Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paessler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash;  Yash! (Y) 11:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Paessler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Zero evidence for notability. Prod was removed, but no information added.  DGG ( talk ) 06:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notablity is established by sources e.g. and .  TYelliot  &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  11:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 12:13, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 12:13, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Thanks for your note,  DGG. I’ve added the most current developments regarding Paessler AG as reported by independent sources. See also the updated references section.  Anton555a ( Talk ) 13:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


 * delete, apparently unknown on dewiki. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep There's an in-depth review in Network World here and a product release story here. The article gives me the impression of COI editing, but it is not hopelessly promotional to the extent of not being worth keeping. Add a COI tag to the article and give the original author a COI warning if they are an SPA. CorporateM (Talk) 01:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.