Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagan hooligans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –MuZemike 00:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Pagan hooligans

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

None of the sources meet the definition of Reliable Sources. The only real indicator of possible notability I see is the ranking at Podcast Alley. except PA is a site that does not have it's own page on the project. So a ranking on a non-notable site does not show notability. TexasAndroid (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No established notability. Claims of high ranking at iTunes (complete with links) cannot be verified as the provided links to not land on a page that even mentions this podcast.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Podcast Alley, while it might be a GOODCHART someday, is at the moment run by just one guy. No other listed sources come close to RS, sorry.  No objection to mentioning the podcast in some other appropriate article per WP:NNC. Jclemens (talk) 01:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Do Not Delete Currently ranked 3rd under iTunes Religion & Spirituality/subCategory Other. Can obviously be verified with anyone who owns the iTunes software. (Viewed 10:30pm EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlecodemonkey (talk • contribs)

*Do Not Delete Because of the new technology of podcasts it is difficult to get a reliable source of popularity on any podcast. Podcasts such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brewing_Network have been in wikipedia for years without deletion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EconTalk has been on since 2007 without any criteria of popularity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thistlepod has been on since 2007 without any real information about it's popularity. There are countless more. A high Podcast Alley ranking is at least something. It is also used as a reference in "This Week in Tech" podcast. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlecodemonkey (talk • contribs) 02:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment You only need to voice your "Do Not Delete" opinion once. The presence of The Brewing Network may be a problem, but just because other bad articles exist is not a reason to keep this one. EconTalk is notable not for its popularity but for the notability of its host and its guests.  Popularity isn't really the criteria here, notability is.  Popularity is just one measure of notability -- a podcast that is highly popular will likely be the subject of independent third party coverage.  A podcast such as "Pagan hooligans" has not generated sufficient independent coverage.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.