Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagan ideals found in Mormon beliefs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Pagan ideals found in Mormon beliefs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This entire article is a synthesis of research written as an essay. The tone clearly indicates that it is written to advocate a position which consists of a novel theory regarding Mormonism. See WP:SYNTHESIS -- Trödel 01:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It might make for an interesting small section of an article about Mormonism, but as written it fails several policies.  Andrew327 02:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOTESSAY. Sources are largely self-published and a general lack of neutrality. hmssolent \Let's convene My patrols 02:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  hmssolent \Let's convene My patrols 02:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - It's a well enough done original essay, but it's an original essay. Publish something like this in a peer-reviewed journal and then check back in a year... Carrite (talk) 04:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as synthesis and a personal essay. J I P  &#124; Talk 04:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Would seem to violate a slew of policies. NickCT (talk) 13:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. Content seems to be largely a synthesis of original research, and therefore not acceptable as a Wikipedia article.  Chri$topher  21:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.