Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagcor Tower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus per WP:IAR. Four IPs from the same range and a brand-new account? I hear quacking; whether it be the meaty or socky kind I don't know. Ironholds (talk) 22:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Pagcor Tower

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is no official information of PAGCOR, or any reliable party about this building. They do not have a particular plan for this building, f.e. which construction company will be involved, when construction will start, what the estimated time of completion will be. The building is not included in recent information of PAGCOR. PAGCOR Tower is nothing more than a short-lived proposal. The visions of this huge building appeared in magazines in 2008 and have been around since on forums. A short-lived proposal is not notable. Leodb (talk) 00:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, all the sources, if there are even any, do not provide any proof to the existance of such project. Sources that were provided as well do not have any notability and seemed to be blogs. Even the official PAGCOR Website does not provide any proof to the possible existance and construction of the Tower. It is merely a vision, and probably placed here to gain support and fame for the project. So I suggest it should be deleted. Rxlxm (talk) 00:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, an article that lacks notability should not be placed in wikipedia, especially if the sources prove none of the claims. 112.210.211.157 (talk) 00:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, sources (as well as lack of sources to) prove none of the claims nor the possible existence of this project. 112.210.188.224 (talk) 09:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, dubious source does not prove anything and lacks notability. 112.210.204.86 (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per above statements. Speedy deletion can be the last choice if this debate fails. 112.210.152.50 (talk) 15:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.