Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page One Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  17:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Page One Management

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable company. This article was created before (along with articles about lots of the people they manage) and deleted. At the time the creator's name was P1Management or somethign like that. As all of the articles were just recreated by a single user, in a very short timeframe, I think it is likely a COI sock as well. (legit sock, since the original account was banned for username vio. But still a COI)

Borderline csd, but I thought I would give the benefit of the consensus, and get something more binding.

All of the artists are non notable imo. Some of them do have a couple of refs, but they are largely in passing, talking about other people.


 * Simone_Otis
 * Beau_Nelson
 * Diana_Carreiro
 * David Allan Jones
 * Zeina_Esmail

There may be more, these are just the ones I grabbed and investigated off of the user's contribs. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Here is the original user's talk page, and the original AFD for one of the articles User_talk:P1magency Articles_for_deletion/Simone_Otis Gaijin42 (talk) 21:07, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:CORP. Toddst1 (talk) 22:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, no real assertion of notability made and three of four cited sources are LinkedIn pages. Daniel Case (talk) 23:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as having been insufficient in-depth coverage by independent third-party sources. If links are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.