Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page Traffic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 00:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Page Traffic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP. This is the best source, but it is hardly reliable or independent as it is the CEO being interviewed. The other references are mainly linkedin or similar sites. Searches in google news bring up nothing. SmartSE (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. — Ed! (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ⋘ HueSatLum ?&thinsp;❢ ⋙ 15:26, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 01:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

 I double checked and seems company name is Pagetraffic and not Page Traffic. When you change the name, lots of references comes up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikehose (talk • contribs) 15:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Whole lotta pseudo-references of no real substance, for a company of no real substance. --Calton | Talk 10:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of significant independent coverage. I found press releases and an article by an aspiring journalist which repeated the company's sales pitch, but nothing more. --Michig (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.