Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page boy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as part of this, I've moved Santori Son's sandbox as a disamib page. Yank sox 20:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Page boy
Information already contained at Page (weddings). Only difference is an external link to a fetish site. SigPig 14:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this all already convered elsewhere. I've deleted their 1 external link to a fetish pr0n site as it fails WP:EL. L0b0t 15:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No more than a dicdef.  Emeraude 15:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Page (weddings) . -- Satori Son 16:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I agree with Satori Son. — Encephalon 16:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Oy! Xdenizen 01:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Either merge any unique content and redirect to Page (weddings) as a sub-topic of the merge target's topic, or delete outright as duplicate article. Do with the image what you will. -- saberwyn 04:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment There is no unique content in this article. L0b0t 13:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Also,it was my understaning that a "page" is the little boy at the wedding, a "page boy" is a type of "bob" haircut for the ladies. L0b0t 13:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: You're right, I forgot about that. And I also missed the medieval term at Page (servant).  How about a disambig instead?  I've created a sample at User:Satori Son/Sandbox and would appreciate comments. -- Satori Son 13:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment That looks pretty good. Nice Job. L0b0t 13:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Page (weddings), or merge if there is any unique content that can be salvaged. Yamaguchi先生 07:22, 1 November 2006
 * What about a disambiguation page (see above) instead? -- Satori Son 16:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Change to disambiguation page per Satori Son; nice solution for the overspecification shown here. However that picture looks like copyvio... -- nae'blis 21:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.