Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PagerDuty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  A  Train talk 08:44, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

PagerDuty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable company, all sources are WP:MILL e.g. venture funding. Additionally created by a likely UPE and SPA. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:50, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment I've used their product before, so no !vote. I'm not sure I'd consider  to be WP:MILL, and $40 million in funding is close to the point of presumed notability for "tech startups". power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:20, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No intellectually independent references, all are based on PRIMARY sources or company announcements, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 11:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.