Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Pagure

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability. Fails WP:NPRODUCT. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 20:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Websites. Skynxnex (talk) 21:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. Not ready to vote yet (but probably leaning toward delete) but the most significant source I've found is Fedora revisits the Git-forge debate which would count, I believe, as both significant and reliable in the open source software space. Less reliable but still significant would be Pagure: DIY git project hosting and a podcast episode: 69: Pagure a GitLab Alternative: Neal Gompa, and a blog post discussion Debian's possible using it Alioth moving toward pagure. I'm not sure if WP:NPRODUCT is the best criteria for open source software; it seems many people use WP:NSOFT (which is only an essay, yes). Skynxnex (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I actually PRODded this but I think the AFD overwrote my PROD based on the timestamps. I don't see enough here for notability, personally. Skarmory   (talk •   contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.