Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pahari Ground


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Pahari Ground

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A single line stub on a non notable topic with no references at all (also no reliable source online). S M S  Talk 15:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  S M S   Talk 16:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  S M S   Talk 16:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found nothing that shows that this is anything but a non-notable local park. SL93 (talk) 20:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: I think it is no more an article with one line and without references. It is also a name of area around park includes some populated place. Many events take place in it.-- Assassin'S Creed T -  E  -  C  -  G  - 08:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep: per WP:HEY, there've been improvements after nomination. Also per WP:FIVE #1 "gazetteer". -- lTopGunl (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources added by User:Assassin's Creed. BusterD (talk) 11:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Even after addition of sources it fails WP:GNG. One source is of a forum, second one where anyone can add an entry for a place, third a police site defining area of jurisdiction, which fails General Notability Guideline. -- S M S  Talk 12:44, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm striking through my keep assertion. I'll have to concede I didn't click through each source. Looking at my contribs, I spent less than three minutes considering my assertion, and that's unlike me. I'm clearly distracted today, and so I'm taking a break. I still think that as a specialty encyclopedia, hence a gazetteer (as mentioned above), we should have articles on notable places, but I can't find sufficient sources (other than the many photographs and videos shot on the park) to say this passes GNG. I suspect offline sources exist in Urdu, but I can't presume they do, based on a reasonable search. It's clearly a verifiable place, but not proved notable. Sorry User:Smsarmad for my hasty assertion. BusterD (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | spill the beans _ 04:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.