Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paid in capital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep - Turnstep 14:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Paid in capital
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Move to Wiktionary? Rmcii 05:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, there seems to be some room for expansion, such as why this is done and its advantages and disadvantages. -- Kjkolb 09:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, business terms such as this tend to have a lot of background. Wikify and refer to Business and Economics. -- AlexWCovington  (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; significant concept in finance and capitalization. I gave it an appropriate stub tag. MCB 04:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral Seems more of a dictionary term. Startup account 19:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. --MaNeMeBasat 13:47, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.