Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paige Ring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 22:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Paige Ring

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:ARTIST TheLongTone (talk) 13:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - could not find any news coverage of her; the Yahoo link is a one-line repost of a video and the Globe and Mail article doesn't mention her at all. (The fact that female and minority creators tend to be relegated by media to aggregation/sponcon/type work instead of being given editorial coverage is a longstanding and frustrating problem, but it does result in that coverage not existing.) Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Agreed, it's bias, which we're trying to combat on Wiki. But, no sources is no sources, we can't do the research ourselves, so here we are. Oaktree b (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women,  and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 14:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete It seems there's a WWF wrestler with the same name. This individual isn't notable, sources are basically her bio in an art gallery and sources close to her. Nothing on the Getty ULAN database. Even limiting it to Canadian sources, not much turns up. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ARTIST. No significant coverage or exhibits. WP:PROMO. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject of this article does not pass WP notability guidelines for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. I agree with the nom and editors above that the article should be deleted. Netherzone (talk) 03:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - classic spam for which is not our thing, filled with laudatory words, yet lacking coverage in reliable sources. In 2007, this could be excused, but in 2022, everyone knows we are not a free web host for "unique" artists. Bearian (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.