Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pailadzo Captanian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Pailadzo Captanian

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable as this is written like story and sources about story, instead of this person.--NovaSkola (talk) 22:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep – this article is well-written and well-sourced. And how does being "written like story and sources about story, instead of this person" infer that the article is "not notable"? — MC10 ( T • C • GB •[ L ]• EM )  22:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The nom's opinion that the article is "written like a story" is not a proper rationale for article deletion. The coverage of this person is enough to warrant inclusion of this topic.  The nom is under the mistaken impression that the topic must be the primary subject of a source.  In fact, a topic can have significant coverage in a source (book or article, for example) that happens to be about another topic. --Oakshade (talk) 00:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 04:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep the NPR story is pretty in-depth and documents her role in the creation of a notable product, Rice-a-Roni. I can't find any other non-trivial sources about her, and I don't know if her book would qualify her for notability under WP:AUTHOR, but at minimum, the information here can be merged somewhere. It certainly doesn't merit deletion. cab (talk) 04:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, author of a notable work. It is more feasible to add info about the book on this biog. John Vandenberg (chat) 12:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.