Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paint online


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  01:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Paint online

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, unsourced  - Jameson L. Tai  talk  ♦  contribs   07:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, idle speculation that falls squarely under WP:CRYSTAL, to my mind. Lankiveil (talk) 10:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL and adds little to the encyclopedia - Dumelow (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, content-free musing. Chris Cunningham (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Weasel words to make its argument, which is uncited original research. Straight-up crystal ballin', yo. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. Unsourced crystal-ballery. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per all of above. Complete original research and speculation that anyone could make up. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to paint chat or oekaki. The idea exists (and has been implemented, in fact), but there's nothing worth merging here. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 22:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - they are completely different. Paint chat as you quoted is just your traditional PC paint program but with multiple connections sharing it; the article in question speculates about a possible new technology creation separate in operation and purpose to that which you mentioned (at least, this is now I am interpreting it). Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps - however, a user looking for "paint online" would probably be more interested in oekaki or paint chat than a blank page, so a redirect to one of the two would be appropriate. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 00:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirects are not a subsitute for the search engine. Otherwise funny little Scandinavian hippo thing would point to Moomin. Chris Cunningham (talk) 00:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.