Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paintball-Net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Paintball-Net
This was a "graphical MUD" that has not existed for 6 years. No independent/reliable sources. No indication of meeting WP:WEB or WP:SOFTWARE. The only thing the game's website says is, "Paintball Net is coming..." and it has an Alexa rank of 3,365,697. I am recommending delete. --Hetar 04:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator's research, especially the Alexa rank. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  04:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as the author hasn't even bothered to assert notability. See: Criteria_for_speedy_deletion, item #7. Aplomado - UTC 04:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Uh, that still only applies to people and groups of people... --Rory096 09:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don't think there is a speedy for software. -- ReyBrujo 05:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Hold on No speedy. I didn't write it. I saw it on prod. I'm digging up some old reviews of the game. Alexa rank is biased toward current items. --Kunzite 06:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. As a former member of another paintball MUD, I know that this game was really the forerunner of the rest of them, but it's still not really that notable. --Rory096 09:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability and that incredibly low Alexa rank. -- Kicking222 14:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. For the record, the game wasn't actually on its website, it was downloaded. --Rory096 20:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.