Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Painted In Blood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Painted In Blood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. Of the four sources here, two are clobbered as primary sources (their album's sales page on iTunes and a concert listing on Ticketfly), and the two that do count as reliable sources are both local to their own hometown (and one of those, further, is a university student newspaper) -- so the volume and quality of sourcing here does not pass WP:GNG in lieu of failing NMUSIC. As always, Wikipedia is not a free PR platform on which any band is automatically entitled to have an article just because they exist. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when their notability and sourceability improve. Bearcat (talk) 05:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as simply none of this is enough for the applicable notability, delete for now as it's too soon for a better article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Certainly too soon, the sources are few and just not notable enough on their own. -- RM 03:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.