Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pair of opposing forces


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Couple (mechanics). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Pair of opposing forces

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't see this ever developing into an article. There is not much more to say about this than the literal meaning.TR 12:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC) TR 12:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not stand as an independent page. Biophys (talk) 20:43, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * When the irresistable cannonball strikes the indestructable wall, the result is delete. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:54, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, there's a lot to say about pairs of opposing forces, but in an encyclopaedia of physics one finds it said under couple, equilibrium, and Newton's third law. This could redirect to any of those.  I suggest the first, since a couple is what this article is striving to describe without actually knowing the right name for the concept.  Uncle G (talk) 20:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.