Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PajamaGram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Vermont Teddy Bear Company. Cirt (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

PajamaGram

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The company does not require an article of its own and the article itself offers zero benefit or encyclopedic relevance. At the most it should be noted within the article of the parent company Vermont Teddy Bear Company but I see no reason or benefit to it having its own article within Wikipedia. NathyWashington (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Vermont Teddy Bear Company, per WP:PRODUCT: "Information on products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy." This is basically a service of the company, so, like the nom, I see no reason not to merge it there.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 23:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to the parent company. This is just advertising. --MelanieN (talk) 00:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.