Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakaran/Wikipedian political entities

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 11:26, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

User:Pakaran/Wikipedian political entities

 * This was apparently never listed in the log. No vote. --Dmcdevit·t 04:14, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Useless, too cluttered, and nonsense. User:Pakaran didn't even make this page; it was made by an anon. I say delete! - 68.72.128.19 04:02, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment It could be that User:Pakaran was the anon. I'm not inclined to delete it until Pakaran denies (or confirms) this. - furrykef (Talk at me) 00:43, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - 68.23.46.106 20:13, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - 69.216.232.38 23:04, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - 68.72.113.117 21:09, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This vfd was started on April, yet as May ends, no resolution has been decided upon. - 68.251.209.191 23:15, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I didn't make that page. Anons have been making it based on some of my user subpages like User:Pakaran/Kingdom of Wikipedia but I wouldn't miss the page in question.  Nor am I asking for it to be deleted; I basically don't care.  Pakaran 11:05, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain Delete - 68.23.111.5 04:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - 68.72.129.171 03:01, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - 68.255.37.206 00:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Normally I wouldn't vote to delete a userpage, but since Pakaran doesn't even care himself, there really isn't much point keeping it. Cyclone49 04:24, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * (Abstain) Comment: good grief. I've never seen so many anon votes. sockpuppet city.  Kingdom of Wikipedia must be an IP shelter. &mdash; F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  07:09, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Have you ever poked an ants' nest with a stick and watched all the ants come scurrying out to see what the problem is? I wonder what the equivalent is for sockpuppets? -- Francs2000 | Talk [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] 15:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - just a load of red links that the user admits to not creating, thus the "user-page sanctity" gentlemen's agreement of Wikipedia is null and void, imo -- Francs2000 | Talk [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 15:09, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * How about just redirecting it to User:Pakaran/Kingdom of Wikipedia ? --Irishpunktom\talk 20:31, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. This is just a lot of made-up BS. Why are inclusionists "liberal" and deletionists "conservative"? Where did all these names come from anyway? Somebody must have just made them up. The last thing we need is another index of useless red-linked articles that will never be created. Binadot 21:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete pointless red-link farm. JamesBurns 07:52, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 12:31, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What the heck are we losing?  We could just as well title this page "List of political terms followed by 'of Wikipedia' just for the heck of it."  Almafeta 02:51, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - if Pakaran will not miss the article and does not care about it's fate, what harm is there to delete the page? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 02:53, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.