Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan Mazdoor Kissan Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  Greenbörg  (talk)  18:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Pakistan Mazdoor Kissan Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional political party. Fails WP:ORG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  09:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Mazdoor Kissan Party. Seems to have been duplicated. Keep per below.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 09:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * leaning keep Contrary to the above, this is not the same as the MKP; it was involved in some court case against the Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation which appears to be notable in itself. Possibly that case is what should have an article instead of the party. Mangoe (talk) 16:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, PMKP notable in its own right, different from the current MKP incarnation. Article is not promotional. --Soman (talk) 20:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, I mostly agree with views above. Much more detailed article is on Mazdoor Kisan Party which only had 1 reference. I started editing it today to try to imprve it.Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, PMKP, although small, is notable as a longstanding political party in Pakistan. The article does not fulfill any reason for deletion, and although consideration as to whether the content should have its own standalone page is warranted, I support keeping this article as a standalone page, in order for the reader to best understand the content. Also, other editors were mistaking the MKP and CMKP articles for PMKP, and wrongly editing those. MKP is not affiliated with PMKP and AFAIK neither is CMKP. As such I do not agree with implementing the contents of this article into either of those articles. Revlurk (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.