Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan and North Korea - a new threat to the world


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Pakistan and North Korea - a new threat to the world
I guess the title says it all. It's a POV essay, cites no sources, possibly an attack page - "Now the world have two monkeys with N-tech" - and contains speculation. Contested prod. MER-C 06:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.  Bakaman Bakatalk  06:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletions.  Bakaman Bakatalk  06:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Rename to Links between Pakistan and North Korea . Bakaman Bakatalk 06:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Though I do agree with the gist of the essay, its unsalvageable.Bakaman Bakatalk 17:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Renaming it wont change the fact that it is all of POV, OR and an Essay. Resolute 06:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete being that Wikipedia is not a publisher of original research, especially poorly-sourced research such as this article. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 06:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, since we don't do original research. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and editorializing. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research with unforgivable title. utcursch | talk 08:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOR --Ragib 09:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV, though I'm not entirely sure what the POV is in this case. Emeraude 09:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, Wikipedia is not a political soapbox. J I P  | Talk 11:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note also that this is the only contribution ever of . This is an obvious Single Purpose Account. J I P  | Talk 12:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete   Doctor Bruno    13:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete POV all over Arnoutf 14:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV original research. A bizarre piece of juvenile pamphleteering. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  15:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above, WP:SNOW, G1, and G10. --N Shar 16:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research, POV, unencyclopedic, etc. snowball this one.-- danntm T C 17:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research - a threat to Wikipedia. Extraordinary Machine 20:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. OR, POV, etc. Unfortunately, none of wp:csd apply, so can't speedy.  -- RoySmith (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously--MonkBirdDuke 09:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete- nonsense and stupidity.Nileena joseph 13:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above -- Lost (talk) 11:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.