Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistani cricket team in Australia in 1991–92


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are not founded in policy because they do not identify reliable sources covering this topic.  Sandstein  13:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Pakistani cricket team in Australia in 1991–92

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NEVENT. Störm  (talk)  14:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - there are articles on touring sides for each cricket season. I don't have access to news archives but there would almost certainly be coverage of Pakistan's tour of Australia at that time in national newspapers (there always is), so the claim of non-notability is simply not true. Another option which would be a valid alternative to deletion would be a merge or redirect to 1991–1992 Australian cricket season but that article currently doesn't exist. So as not to undo the good work of cricket editors here I see why this article can't be kept pending that being created. Again, another instance where deletion is a lazy option. Deus et lex (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Once again, I'll say what I said on other similar nominations. We have a complete series of articles on the official cricket tours, and because there is a complete series, readers (remember them?) can find their way around easily. What is the encyclopedic merit in seeking to destroy that? Johnlp (talk) 12:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. This was obviously not a tour but part of the World Cup; warm up matches can be dealt with in a sentence (or two if we're being extravagant) there. Any attempt to dress it up as a tour in the traditional sense is ludicrous. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Matches on this trip were organised around the CWC. Merge and redirect would be undue. Does not meet criteria for a standalone article. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and other delete !voters. Users arguing to keep are making an WP:OSE argument. SK2242 (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - how is this an "other stuff exists" argument? The suggestions are that the content is sourced and worth keeping but there are potential alternatives to deletion (which must be considered first). Deus et lex (talk) 07:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.