Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistanis in Singapore (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 02:32, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Pakistanis in Singapore
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is a stub and has been that way for a long time. References haven't been updated for 7 years and there is a lot of original research (in the lead and in "notable people"). Also, there are no articles for larger expatriate or transient worker communities in Singapore, like the Germans, French, especially the Bangladeshis. There is not much of a case to be made for its notability right now. Tiger7253 (talk) 18:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as the subject passes the notability threshold, with journalistic and scholarly sources available. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cordless Larry's excellent comment on this. Additionally, it's not clear why this was renominated after the references shown in the previous AFD. FOARP (talk) 11:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per above comments.-- PA TH  SL OP U  13:38, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - at least four of the references are reliable. There are plenty of sources available. Poor sourcing is not a reason to delete, but to tag and improve. Bearian (talk) 19:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.