Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paladin: Dawn of the Dragonslayer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Michig (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Paladin: Dawn of the Dragonslayer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Only hint/suggestion of notability is weak and not viably sourced. As of this point it's a non-notable film by an as-of-yet non-notable director, added by WP:COI-wielding editor. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 13:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I reviewed the notability criteria for films, and wasn't able to find any specific part of those criteria that this film meets: it isn't in wide release, hasn't been reviewed by multiple nationally-known critics, hasn't won any significant awards, been selected for preservation in a national archive, or been the subject of a university class.  The only cited source appears to be a press release; the only additional source I found was an interview on a blacklisted site which doesn't support a claim to notability anyway. I am, of course, open to the possibility that after the film's release, it will become notable, and that Wikipedia will then need an article about it- but that article should be written by someone who was not involved in the production or distribution of the film. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: I only found non-reliable sources and press releases. SL93 (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice per WP:TOSOON. The film has only recently been released and is just starting to get coverage in non-rs genre sources, We can wait for it to be covered by reliable sources.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.