Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palak Purswani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  15:49, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Palak Purswani

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

She doesn't meet the criteria for WP:NACTOR due to the absence of any lead roles (significant roles) in her filmography. Furthermore, there is a lack of in-depth coverage WP:SIGCOV. The majority of the references consist of brief mentions or promotional announcements. Premature-ish as per WP:TOOSOON. CGGCA201 (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. CGGCA201 (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. A significant role does not have to be a leading role. That's why film awards recognize "best supporting actor/actress". Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. I agree with Eastmain, A significant role does not have to be a leading role. Also, there are enough notable references to prove the content of the article and that it meets the criteria. Although, It can be edited or can have Citation needed tag wherever there are no notable references and do not need deletion. DSN18 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fashion,  and Maharashtra.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are enough referencing to support notability and do not require deletion. All the reality shows she had done are well known. Also, they link back to her profile from notable articles. It can be improved but no need for deletion. Strivedi1 (talk) 12:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Vote-stacking by User:Strivedi1, an account was formed after the discussion began. This ID also expressed a keep vote in favor of another ongoing AfD discussion, which involved a page created by the same editor responsible for creating the page of Palak Purswani. CGGCA201 (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep.:The work and roles of palak purswani in television serials and reality shows are notable and article has notable and verifiable references to prove it. It can be improved by editing if any issues with styling and do not require deletion. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: @DSN18 Your previous vote has already been registered. CGGCA201 (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello @CGGCA201, thank you for considering my vote. DSN18 (talk) 21:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - There must be some concern in this deletion discussion that the page creator has voted twice and did not strike their second !vote, even when that was pointed out. Moreover that an SPA has appeared in support of the page creator's deletion discussions. Nevertheless Eastmain's point is correct inasmuch as a significant role need not be a lead role. I would ask for clarification: what evidence do we have of significant roles? The lead says She had worked in television serials... She has also been featured in the web series ... She is seen in the second season ... None of these suggest or tell of a significant role. What significant roles has she played that meets the first criterion of WP:NACTOR? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello @Sirfurboy, I accept my mistake of second vote and have strikeout the second one. Palak had played important role of ex-girlfriend of Lead in 'Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke' which is important role and has notable references. one of which is . She was also seen in the web series 'Roohaniyat' alongside lead Arjun Bijlani She is now also seen in 'Roohaniyat Chapter 2' where the series romantic drama revolves around her too, also providing reference to prove that too.  . As far as reality show is concern you will find many notable reference for her for Spitsvilla 7, Nach Baliye season 9 and recently Bigg Boss OTT season 2. . All these references are notable and verifiable to prove it. Thank You. DSN18 (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Sirfurboy, She also won an award for Most Stylish Reality Show Star recently. DSN18 (talk) 11:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I am not familiar with much of the context of this, nor with the quality of the sources so not ready to come down as a clear keep at this point, but neither do I see a clear reason to delete. Deletion is a discussion, and if no one familiar with the quality of these sources can demonstrate a reason why these should not count as independent significant coverage, I would suspect there is no reason to delete. But my lack of expertise here is showing, so I will leave it at that for now. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:32, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * This source, which is source 2 of those posted, does look like significant independent coverage. Some of the others less so, but on balance, and in the absence of any strong arguments that the sources provided lack the necessary quality, I think this one crosses the line. - Keep. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are several reliable, secondary and independent sources which have significant coverage which is also independent to the subject. Such as abplive, india today, timesofindia etc. Thus it passes the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Fade258 (talk) 06:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.