Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palak Shukla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Palak Shukla

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

BLP Prod denied because there's a non linked reference to a newspaper. I haven't found much on google search other than social networking sites. Nothing other than the single indication in the page. Shadowjams (talk) 10:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As it is now, it lacks references. The newspaper reference (an advert) does not mention her name (see here), it only has a picture. (It took a bit of poking around at epaper.timesofindia.com). Tried to find references with google but as Shadowjams already mentioned it just turns up social networking site links. Jarkeld (talk) 11:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Triwbe (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Beautiful girl, but no proof of the notability required. Fails basic Notability and WP:ENTERTAINER. Triwbe (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Guys give me some time may be until tomm, i m trying to hook up references......

Oopsalion (talk) 11:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The delete discussion will last for at least 5 days before a final decision is taken. --Triwbe (talk) 11:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Citations are misleading and probably made-up as per User:Jarkeld above. --hydrox (talk) 12:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok, i have added another reference, now this is something where the agencies/coordinators list the viable candidates themselves and the mentioned people do not play any role. There are many more but i cannot access them at the moment as i am behind a firewall.Oopsalion (talk) 12:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It appears from her modeling bio that she has appeared in some advertisements, and that is about it... doesn't sound notable to me. Hopefully her career will prosper, but... no article yet. Brianyoumans (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Updated info 122.177.81.89 (talk) 16:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

i think u guys are biased with indians and cannot see anyone else flourishing rather than ur own self and ur countrymen, good keep it that way, i m deleting the article myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oopsalion (talk • contribs) 02:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Please try to assume good faith on the part of other editors. Personally, I voted to keep several India-related articles in the last few days, including one that was a little dubious. I try to look at each article on its own merits, and I understand that articles from non-English-speaking countries (or in India's case, largely non-English-speaking) need a certain degree of special treatment. Brianyoumans (talk) 04:39, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, current version is straight-up biospam. Hairhorn (talk) 04:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.