Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paleofuture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Retro-futurism. I think this is a better target but I would have no objection to it being retargeted to Paleofuture.com (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Paleofuture

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think this is a real word, all the google hits seem to be about a blog. RenegadeMonster (talk) 09:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:WINAD (Wikipedia is not a dictionary) - Mgm|(talk) 12:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – a lone blog about the subject does not establish notability of this apparent neologism. MuZemike 17:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Paleofuture.com, the article I just created about the blog, which seems to be quite notable. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  19:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Term itself is non-notable, but the blog appears to be copiously sourced. - Vianello (talk) 22:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above, though i am not convinced of notability of the blog, at least with the blog theres a case to be made, no matter how tenuous. no question that this neologism is not notable yet (and i like it personally). Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.