Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  14:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Palit

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Disputed prod. This company may manufacturer good products but that does not mean the company is notable and deserves an article here. If there is notability to be established it must come through reliable sources and not corporate PR departments. JodyBtalk 16:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete again — article was already A7'd; just because its products exist on newegg.com doesn't mean it's worthy of inclusion here. Notability is not established via reliable secondary sources, as the nom suggested. MuZemike  ( talk ) 17:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. A poorly-written article about a fledgling company. TopGearFreak   Talk  17:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per A7.  abf  /talk to me/  17:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - For reasons stated aboveBritishWatcher (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete There's a small local restaurant where I live, they make good pizza, but yet, is not nearly notable. Acebulf (talk) 21:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete-per above(s) Dengero (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Poorly written but probably notable, ATI and AMD hardware reviews are well covered by many technical rags. Author needs to expend more effort to pass WP:N policy. - DustyRain (talk) 08:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.