Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palki (2016 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 02:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Palki (2016 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Likely WP:TOOSOON and fails GNG, if someone can find better sourcing then go for it, but I couldn't in my cursory search. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:44, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Filmmaker:
 * lead:
 * Producer:
 * Studio:


 * Comment: Apparently in post production, if we find suitable coverage, we'd have a meeting of WP:NFF (paragraph 3).  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment From what I understand, passing WP:NFF is not a pass for notability, post-production films still need to pass GNG or do they only need to pass WP:NFILM? Thanks. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, for a film not-yet-released, if it's production has coverage to meet WP:NFF (paragraph 3) then we'd have a meeting of WP:NF... and we do allow articles for such if inclusion criteria are met. So if this filmed project has the requisite coverage, it can have an article. If not, then no. I might take a look myself when I get back from work today.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 16:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * MichaelQSchmidt is correct; a film that is still in production or post-production for a future release can pass our notability rules for films if adequate RS coverage is there to support the article. It certainly doesn't get an automatic inclusion freebie if the article is completely unsourced as this is, but a film that's already been released doesn't get that either — but our notability rules for films hinge on the sourcing, not the release date. That said, this is a completely unsourced article as things currently stand. So while I'm willing to reconsider this if adequate sourcing shows up before closure, for the moment it's a delete without prejudice against recreation if and when the available sourcing gets better. Bearcat (talk) 00:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: Palki
 * Filmmaker:
 * lead:
 * WP:INDAFD: Palkhi
 * Producer:
 * Studio:
 * Producer:
 * Studio:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮  JAaron95  Talk  17:53, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I am okay with Delete until filming is confirmed AND it gains coverage to meet WP:NFF. Being "too soon" does not mean forever, only that the article is premature.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 00:29, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.