Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pallavi Patil (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) &#x222F; WBG converse 07:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Pallavi Patil
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails all the criteria of notability criteria for actors. Most of the mentions are from gossip-like sources. Whatever mentions from reliable sources are, are just passing references, or "second hand"; mostly about the films the films that she is in. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, thus failing general notability criteria as well. — usernamekiran (talk)  18:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — usernamekiran (talk)   21:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — usernamekiran (talk)   21:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 00:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as does have some prominent roles but a number of the productions don't have articles, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * none of the roles seem to be prominent. — usernamekiran (talk)  18:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * found BaapManus and this Draft:Boyz 2 where she has prominent roles, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * only in BaapManus she has a prominent role. Not in the Boyz 2. In any case she fails WP:NACTOR. — usernamekiran (talk)  23:32, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

The creator is blocked for socking per this SPI casepage. There are very high chances is evidence that this is a case of paid editing. — usernamekiran (talk)  18:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC) In a nutshell: to pass WP:GNG, the subject must have WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. This subject doesnt have this. Could anybody please provide reliable sources that cover the subject significantly? — <span class="monospaced" style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran (talk)  08:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NEXIST and WP:GNG. gidonb (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Before nominating, I also thought the same. But there is no WP:SIGCOV, and she doesnt have enough prominent roles (only one role in a TV serial), thus failing WP:NACTOR. — <span class="monospaced" style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran (talk)  18:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:NACTOR is an entirely different standard. Irrelevant to my claim. From checking the online sources, she passes the WP:GNG. gidonb (talk) 18:46, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep After considering what was said up to now, this is a keep. In any case WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG are not mutually exclusive. Yes she fails WP:NACTOR but has coverage on the other side. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.