Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palm Peak Formation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. And rename to Palm Park Formation. (non-admin closure) — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 23:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Palm Peak Formation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The formation name cannot be found at the cited Fossilworks source, nor at GEOLEX, nor with a Google or Google Scholar search. Kent G. Budge (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep by rename to Palm Park Formation, the current title seems to be an error. See, , Fossilworks entry here.  Palm Park formation clearly exists and is notable via WP:GNG, and I'm almost certain this current title is based on a conflation between the proper name and the nearby Rubio Peak Formation. Hog Farm Bacon 02:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Makes sense to me. As the original nominator for deletion, I'm going to recommend the reviewing administrator close this with Rename as the decision. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep and then immediately move to Palm Park Formation, as outlined above. Incorrectly named article. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment http://fossilworks.org/?a=collectionSearch&collection_no=17001 does mention the phrase Palm Peak Formation, hence confusion. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to Palm Park Formation per the above.  // Timothy ::  talk  16:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I have no problem with the name change. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename. It's been a week and there seems to be complete consensus. As I understand the process, all that's needed is for an administrator to formalize the decision and then I can go rename the page. Administrators? --Kent G. Budge (talk) 16:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.