Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palmer & Klug

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 08:16, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Palmer & Klug
Nonnotable band. Phrases "Palmer & Klug" and "Palmer and Klug" get zero google hits. Indrian 01:14, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 02:06, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, probable vanity of some sort. Wyss 07:31, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Xezbeth  07:55, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable vanity band. --Deathphoenix 04:44, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable. I'm also tagging for VfD Electrotards, the only article that links here (and to which no other link to). JoaoRicardo 04:12, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not established. Smoddy | &epsilon;&iota;&pi;&epsilon;&tau;&epsilon; 22:09, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Not patently vanity. Does not violate Wikipedia rules.  Article is unbiased and informational.  Would like to see more info, however.  Keep and allow for growth  zomb1
 * ''Please note that the above vote was NOT by User:z0mb1. It was put in by User:63.171.166.140 -- Infrogmation 02:45, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The aforementioned IP is apparantly User:z0mb1. (the immature message was not left by me, read the current revision for an explanation) -Frazzydee|&#9997; 03:39, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.