Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paloma Kwiatkowski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Paloma Kwiatkowski

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A secondary role in a film which has not been even completed does not create notability. Ymblanter (talk) 15:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR criteria; at best a long way WP:TOOSOON. AllyD (talk) 07:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, active since 2012-present, 18 years old. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 11:54, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.