Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paloma Reynosa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of NCIS characters. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Paloma Reynosa

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced article on a TV character that doesn't show notability. Already listed at List of NCIS characters.  M J 94 02:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think that her two entries on List of NCIS characters would be about sufficient... A brief search for sources is turning up very very little. IMdB, the NCIS Wiki, another wiki, another wiki, some message boards, some blogs... I say delete the standalone article, delete one of the sections about her on the character list, and try to reference the remaining one. — GorillaWarfare talk 02:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the duplicate section at List of NCIS characters and moved the original section into the deceased characters section. --AussieLegend (talk) 05:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect - She is a minor character in the series not deserving of a separate article, which is unsourced and consists of little more than is currently contained in List of NCIS characters. An alternative would be to direct the article to List of NCIS characters. --AussieLegend (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I think NCIS is a particularly stupid series and I don't watch it. Therefore I have no idea as to the notability of this character. But I will second the motion to delete the article based on WP:NOTGUIDE WP:INDISCRIMINATE, in that Wikipedia is not a plot guide for the series and the entire article at this point consists of a condensed plot line relating to the character. -- BenTels (talk) 17:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not much more than a regular villain of the week, and a completely forgettable one at that.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 19:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per AussieLegend. Jclemens (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * A redirect makes sense, as the name might be a reasonable search term, and there isn't another subject in need of the title. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Had she continued to appear as a recurring character over a long stretch of the series, an article might, might have been justified (with sources, of course). But three episodes doesn't do it - there isn't enough material for others to write about the character, and thus the likelihood of independent sourcing coming along is slim to none. Shame, too - woman was batshit crazy. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.