Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pam Pollard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Note that WP:AfD is not cleanup - the quality of the article has no bearing on the notability of the subject. ansh 666 07:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Pam Pollard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 06:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 07:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 07:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 07:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 07:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Minor political functionary, not elected, fails WP:NBIO. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:HEY, Keep.  running searches produces WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no evidence in this AfD that this topic fails either GNG or NPOL, and being a minor political functionary is not a metric that we consider.  As per NBIO, "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."  Unscintillating (talk) 12:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable political figure whose article is backed by ample reliable and verifiable sources. Alansohn (talk) 15:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep- sources are there, its not unusual for a leader of a state political party to be considered notable. As per WP:POLOUTCOMES, "Leaders of registered political parties at the national or major sub-national (state, province, prefecture, etc.) level are sometimes considered notable despite their party's lack of electoral success." (and her party has had electoral success in Oklahoma).--Rusf10 (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. A very minor political career. This is a poorly written article, lacking citations. Perhaps if it was cleaned up it would be more notable. Jooojay (talk) 08:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.