Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamlico 140


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Pamlico 140

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable product. --- RockMFR 17:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Weak Delete As above, but if it could be proven that someone notable used one, maybe it could be saved. Colds7ream (talk) 18:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Since the article states that this is a discontinued product, and there is no link to the company (unless I missed it) this doesn't fall under advertising. I'd rather see someone from the kayaking community weigh in on this. Reasonable effort was expended on the article, which counts favorably for me. --Quartermaster (talk) 18:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 00:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * weak delete. Some effort gone into this; but the companies don't even have articles, and WP:NOT a kayak catalogue. Rd232 talk 02:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course it's not, but no one claimed it was. Since we have no notability guidelines for Kayaks we clearly need an expert to weigh in on this or even better, judge it on possible references rather than perceived notability. - Mgm|(talk) 12:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * "No one claimed it was" - true, but that's the impression the content gives. Without references, it's hard to judge notability except on perception. Together with not having articles on the makers of this particular model it's a fairly big thumbs down for me, slightly mitigated by the effort put in. Rd232 talk 13:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.