Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamlico Ravine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 05:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Pamlico Ravine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research/neologism plus a class or group of people that does not asset notability. Despite the appearance of at least the first paragraph, there is no such place as Pamlico Ravine. A Google search reveals only Wikipedia, mirrors, blogs, and Urban Dictionary. Serpent&#39;s Choice 04:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unattributed and unattributable. The only non-trivial reference given doesn't actually refer to the Pamlico Ravine. May be an elaborate hoax or may be slang used by a minuscule group of people. -- Charlene 04:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is a neologism for the area and does not have enough verifiable info anyway to deserve its own article. The area is already covered by the Inner Banks article anyway and that term is much much more recognizable. Besides, urban dictionary is hardly a good source and Myspace, unless it has to deal with actual bands, is also a bad source. --Triadian 06:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The quote, "This group, hailing itself by various names including "Team PAMRAV" may be responsible for the dissemination of the term Pamlico Ravine, as its members purportedly coined the phrase." says it all. Delete.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 14:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Unverifiable.  Ford MF 21:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.