Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pan European ICT & eBusiness Network for SME


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a WP:Soft delete; the article may be restored by any administrator upon request. MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Pan European ICT & eBusiness Network for SME

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

EU organisation with no independent refs. Despite promises a WP:REFUND, no new sources have been added. No incoming wikilinks. Many of the claims, including the 'more than 20 000' headline one, appear to be unsupported by even the non-independent refs. All the links are out of date. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Thanks to User:Anpa80 for adding some more sources, as previously promised. The WP:GNG requires that articles have in depth coverage in independent sources; as such to the articles' continued existence we need references that aren't written or published by members or funders of this organisation. These appear to still be lacking. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best as my searches only found a few links. SwisterTwister   talk  07:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.