Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panama City Jaguars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Panama City Jaguars

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From what I can tell this team never played. Their website doesn't exist anymore and I believe they fail GNG Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any coverage, reliable or not, about this "team". Fails notability. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Everything I can find says they are 'scheduled' to play, but no info on anything actually being played Deunanknute (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As far as I can see the team never existed. They might have been planning for it to exist, but apparently it never materialized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.95.216.224 (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable American minor league women's football team. There is no mention of this team in the main WFA league article, and no indication the team ever played a single game, let alone a complete season.  Subject fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.