Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) Darkspots (talk) 00:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable commercial product. Reads as an advertisement and is completely unreferenced. Wikipedia is not a Panasonic catalog. Wikipedia is not a digital camera guide. Mikeblas (talk) 04:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable commercial product for which a lot of sources exist. Nomination is a boilerplate nomination showing no consideration of the merits of the specific article. Article contains external links that, while not listed as references, are almost certainly sources for much of the article and show that sources could easily be found for most or all of the content. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 04:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep the FZ10 and FZ20 were some of the first "non-professional" digital cameras to come with a decent lens (leica) and a 12x Optical zoom lens - something that is much more common now. Definatly notable - needs sourcing though. Fosnez (talk) 08:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added references to the article (New York Times, The Age, PC World), but it could probably do with a few more if someone has time? Fosnez (talk) 08:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep notable product Ban  Ray  09:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks to be in good shape now. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 13:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - early example of a now common trend in digital photography (consumer-grade, ultra-zoom, high-grade optics) ++Arx Fortis (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.