Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panatheism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Wiktionary.. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  essay  // 03:51, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Panatheism

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page should be deleted as it has been moved to Wiktionary. However, my PROD was deleted because the page has apparently been PRODed before. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  01:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment it should redirect somewhere. 65.93.15.125 (talk) 05:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Soft redirect to wiktionary, surely.— S Marshall T/C 12:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Wiktionary, at best. It is not even clear if the word is really used, outside of to make an example. Even then WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary.Kitfoxxe (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Annie Dillard, author of Teaching a Stone to Talk: Expeditions and Encounters. The term as used in the book gets a bit of discussion in other sources, but nothing I am finding really indicates that we should have a separate article. I have added pan-atheism to the find sources template above, as it seems to be used interchangeably with the hyphenless, and older databases care about such things. - 2/0 (cont.) 16:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Disagree with that merge, as the target article has no mention of this word or even of atheism, and barely mentions the book in question. Also note the book is a collection of essays, only one which mentions the word. This is just more ammo to the delete/Wiktionary argument. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  08:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Delete - Just a term, not notable. Just atheism. --Antwerpen Synagoge (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Either redirect to Wiktionary or merge with Nontheism and redirect. Either way don't keep! The article doesn't tell me anything about the term beyond a definition. The Russell quote may express the same sentiment as the person who coined the term, it doesn't establish notability that a well-known philosopher happened to say the same thing. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. The above editor (Antwerpen Synagoge) has been identified and blocked as a sockpuppet of the a blocked editor, see Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה/Archive. Rmhermen (talk) 14:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as a dictionary definition. I don't think that we do soft crossproject redirects, or do we?  Sandstein   05:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.