Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandemic (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per CSD A7 and WP:SNOW.   GARDEN  19:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Pandemic (band)

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 23:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Joe Chill. Utterly non-notable. Yilloslime T C  02:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Good luck for the future but as of now they haven't made it, not in the media or in terms of notability. - Warthog Demon  03:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can not find in-depth coverage; appears to fail WP:BAND at this time.  Gongshow  Talk 19:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete under criterion A7. --Shirik (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7, A7, A7, A7 --Fbifriday (talk) 07:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Plain ordinary Delete (IMHO schools and bands are not subject to Speedy A7) - but note they "currently only play at live performances (mainly in Uckfield), but are planning to release an album soon." Thus this band miserably fails WP:BAND.  When they tour UK and release an album, I would favor re-creation.  Until then, they are just not notable.  BTW, Internet searches reveal nothing at all about the band, even after excluding false Ghits. Bearian (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I understand your argument that bands are not eligible for CSD criterion A7, especially given that db-band exists just for that purpose, but given that we both agree with delete perhaps this is a discussion for another time/place. --Shirik (talk) 19:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.