Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandikona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Pandikona

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG. Article has no sources whatsoever, a search of both online databases and my own resources revealed nothing at all, a Google search revealed nothing attributable. Cavalryman (talk) 01:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:28, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article is based on one no-author-given and no-reference-provided website (breeder). Google Books and Google Scholar return nothing. There is no description given for this dog, yet the article implies that every dog that looks similar to the one pictured can only be found among the villages of Pandikona district of India - dubious, refer to the Indian pariah dog which states "They have erect ears, a wedge-shaped head, and a curved tail."  William Harris Canis lupis track.svg talk Canis lupis track.svg 08:28, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only reference, Pandikona's Website, doesn't even contain most of the info found on Wikipedia. Based on the pictures there, this "breed" can consist of all manner of colours and sizes. Wikipedia states the rarest colour is "brindle" (?), but the website says that there is only one black-coloured dog... doesn't jive/not logical. The site also states the dogs can only be purchased in the village, so all this advertisement about how great pets they make is almost pointless. Basically this is questionable info about an undefined "breed" recognised by no one except a single website.Leo Breman (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Comment. The article is not based on one author and this breed wont be available with any breeders as in India, nothing is official as how it happens in western countries. You guys have to understand that this is a LANDRACE and derived from the Indian pariah as mentioned in the website. Will change the same in the starting point of the website but these are part of villagers tradition and tribals/villagers dont just give their puppies and so they are not sold, they are given if they trust you can take care of the pup. Dont know why everything has to be officially certified as the villagers dont know about wikipedia or any dna tests as they just have them from centuries. If any organisation is willing to take care of these stuff then please go ahead and do us that favour so that these beautiful dogs gets recognised by whatever FCs you guys want."  Dilip  10:28, 08 Sep 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jambulad (talk • contribs)