Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandurangapuram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. joe deckertalk to me 17:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Pandurangapuram

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has no third-party references whatsoever, piles of unsourced content and a completely miscellaneous image (seemingly from the film Avatar ) with no clear link to the topic. More concerningly, the village is subject to absolutely no significant coverage in reliable sources that I'm able to find; most mentions of it that I can find seem to be directory listings rather than detailed discussion. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  co-prince  ─╢ 11:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Come on, Treasury Tag, you know better than this. It's a verifiable geographical location.  Feel free to remove the unsourced content and the miscellaneous image using the normal editing process, but articles about villages are kept.— S Marshall  T/C 15:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Remind me which notability guideline applies to villages? ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  co-prince  ─╢ 15:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I hate specific notability guidelines and I always rely on the GNG. But that's sufficient in this case because per this discussion, a map is a secondary source.  The reason I say "you know better than this" is because to my certain knowledge, you've participated in AfDs where this has been discussed before.— S Marshall  T/C 16:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Looks like a village to me. . Per long standing convention, population centers are notable regardless of size.--Oakshade (talk) 16:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep As a real village it is inherently notable. Edward321 (talk) 00:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Which of the speedy keep criteria do you think applies here? ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  prorogation  ─╢ 07:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - villages are considered to have inherent notability (see WP:NPLACE. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 22:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.