Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panelite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete JERRY talk contribs 18:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Panelite

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Reads like an advert. Non-notable company. Searching Google for "Panelite llc" brings up 121 distinct results. (Note that there are several unrelated products called panelite, hence the search for Panelite llc.). Other than WIkipedia, all are directory entries, location maps, or the company's own pages - there is not one third party source providing verifiable or even unverifiable information on this company. Emeraude (talk) 20:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain (talk) 06:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Simply adding references does not, in itself, establish notability. The references are to an exhibition catalogue, a TV programme website (on which I've been unable to find the information suggested) and to a building magazine. Not sure if any of these establish notability for Panelite.Emeraude (talk) 11:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:N. --Kannie | talk 03:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The article fails the primary criterion of WP:CORP. There would need to be multiple secondary sources as the sole valid 2S at the moment is a brief mention of an award given to a single product. A 10-page Google search turned up mostly self-promotion and product adverts. This is the only potentially useful reference I found and I have concerns over its neutrality. Not enough to build an article. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 03:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to fail WP:CORP. Lankiveil (talk) 07:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC).
 * Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.