Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pangaea (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Neıl   ☄   10:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Pangaea (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article subject fails WP:BAND. The page is just another nn advert on Wikipedia. Libs (talk) 00:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - contested prod, completely nn, no EV. -- LordSunday    (₪Scribe₪)   (♦)  01:30, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:BAND. Does not convey notability. Bvlax2005 (talk) 03:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure yet - one of the problems about this article is the fact that it mentions significant coverage, but in non-English-language sources. This makes it harder to verify, and hard to know how reliable those sources are. I'd say they just about meet criterion # 5 for musicians and ensembles in WP:BAND. The have one album released on Sony, and two on Musea, although I have no idea how "important" Musea is. There seem to be plenty of reviews of the albums around, but I couldn't find any from reliable sources.-- Beloved  Freak  09:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   — Beloved  Freak  09:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.